Susan Schniepp of Regulatory Compliance Associates Discusses the Impact of QMS on Quality Maturity at INTERPHEX 2024
At INTERPHEX 2024, Susan Schniepp, distinguished fellow, Regulatory Compliance Associates, and co-chair of board of directors, Parenteral Drug Association, explores the impact of QMS on quality maturity.
Editor's note: this story was originally published on PharmTech.com.
In an interview with Pharmaceutical Technology®, Susan Schniepp, distinguished fellow, Regulatory Compliance Associates, and co-chair of board of directors, Parenteral Drug Association, expands on the importance of maintaining a robust quality management system (QMS) in bio/pharmaceutical manufacturing. Schniepp hosts an interactive session on the impact of QMS on quality maturity at INTERPHEX, held in New York City on April 16–18, 2024.
For advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) in particular, Schniepp emphasizes how fast-moving this sector is. “The regulations don't keep up with the ATMPs. That technology, and their way of thinking, is turning over quicker than the regulations,” she says.
“The changes in the regulations that are going to come are going to be around quality culture and maintaining a robust quality management system,” she adds. Ensuring documentation and keeping equipment calibrated are important practices to apply to these new fast-moving ATMPs, she states. Schniepp does not necessarily expect to see many changes in the regulations around ATMP development and manufacturing but thinks that there will likely be more guidance documents issued in the future, with one of FDA’s focuses being its quality management maturity model.
“There are some regulations out there that call out quality culture. In particular, the World Health Organization has one on data integrity. It has a definition and standard[s] on what quality culture is,” Schniepp says. She points out that a new aspect of her presentation at INTERPHEX this year is its interactive component, in which she sets up a scenario involving an audit where an incident occurs. She gives the audience three potential responses to discuss, but rather than simply asking them which response do they pick or which response is correct, she instead asks what does the chosen response say about that person or that company’s QMS and the maturity of that system?
