FDA Maps Strategies to Advance Cell and Gene Therapies

The continued surge in research and development of cell and gene therapies is prompting FDA officials to ramp up guidance development, streamline oversight, and take steps to advance manufacturing and clinical development of these cutting-edge treatments. This wave of innovation includes somatic cell gene therapies able to correct gene defects by replacing, repairing, or inactivating a gene, either by directly administered gene therapy to the patient or by taking cells from the body, modifying them in culture, and returning them to the patient.

FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) has seen an “explosion” of growth in the cellular and gene therapy area, observed CBER Deputy Director Celia Witten at the Cell & Gene Therapy Products Symposium in June 2019 sponsored by CASSS (1). CBER’s Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies (OTAT) received more than 400 investigational new drug applications (INDs) in 2018, many qualifying for breakthrough therapy status and the Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapies (RMATs) designation for products that provide evidence of intent to treat, modify, or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition. For such therapies, FDA offers manufacturers extra assistance in developing innovative product testing and production methods, expedited review, and flexibility in documenting quality and meeting requirements.

A main FDA challenge is to devise standards for this burgeoning cadre of experimental products. FDA is working with the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) and has contracted with the Nexight Group to coordinate the standard development and assessment process (2). Collaborations seek standard practices in cell counting, measuring flow cytometry, and assuring cell viability. FDA also is engaged in devising common regulatory approaches and policies for developing and testing innovative therapies with authorities in other regions. The Gene Therapy Working Group of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme (IPRP) has finalized a reflection paper on expectations for biodistribution assessments for gene therapy products (3). This may provide a basis for the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) to develop a guideline on biodistribution studies of gene therapy vectors (4).

Advanced manufacturing key

A main challenge in testing and developing these new therapies, Witten noted, is to devise new tools and policies to support more complex manufacturing processes. A lack of capacity for producing lentiviral and adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors can limit clinical development, she observed, while current cell lines often are not able to meet demand for large-scale or rapid production. Regulators and sponsors are looking to advanced manufacturing technology devised for vaccine production processes to inform similar approaches for optimizing cell lines for production, improving yield of recombinant technology, and applying continuous manufacturing concepts to new treatments.

The expedited development and approval of cellular and gene therapies requires a “new paradigm,” said Steven Oh, deputy director of OTAT’s Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies, at the CASSS symposium. He noted the unique challenges created by limited manufacturing experience prior to licensure and limited understanding of critical quality attributes (CQAs) due to difficulties in characterizing the drug product, drug substance, and in-process material for these therapies. Products vary, moreover, due to unusual source materials, less qualified assays, and limited stability data.

Despite these difficulties, Oh emphasized that sponsors cannot ignore requirements for complying with chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) and current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) standards. It is important, therefore, to focus on these issues early in clinical development to support the accelerated review and approval of a product with a breakthrough or RMAT designation. Manufacturers should plan for commercial-scale manufacturing and conduct needed comparability studies as early as Phase I and II studies. Raw material qualification and supply chain issues should be addressed, and assays should be developed and validated.

At the same time, FDA may exercise some flexibility on the type and extent of manufacturing information expected with a submission, particularly for validation strategies and the manufacturing scale-up program, Oh said. He added that such leeway will depend on product characteristics, the seriousness of the condition being treated, the type of manufacturing process, the robustness of a quality system, and the strength of the risk-based quality assessment. Regulatory flexibility usually will be linked to agreements on post-marketing commitments and requirements.

To assist manufacturers in designing untraditional production or development programs, CBER officials have established the CBER Advanced Technologies Team (CATT) to discuss and respond to queries from industry on advanced manufacturing and testing technologies (5). This team aims to assist in developing products where CBER has “limited experience with the manufacturing or development process.” CBER wants inquiries to briefly describe the technology, why it is novel and unique, its potential impact on product quality, and a summary of the manufacturing or development plan.

Developers of innovative therapies similarly can use CBER’s INTERACT program (INitial Targeted Engagement for Regulatory Advice on CBER producTs). This replaces pre-pre-IND interactions and offers early-stage informal consultation on product development. INTERACT is particularly useful for complex or novel manufacturing technologies, innovative devices, and cutting-edge testing methodologies. Such early discussion provides nonbinding advice and doesn’t replace the recommended pre-IND meeting for products further along the development pathway.

A CBER internal working group on advanced manufacturing is soliciting proposals to support innovation relevant to producing complex biologics, including novel and improved materials, manufacturing innovations, and new analytical methods. CBER is expanding laboratory research programs and collaborating with academics and other partners to develop improved cell lines for vector production and advanced manufacturing technologies.

These strategies to provide appropriate and efficient pathways for bringing innovative therapies to patients so far have involved treatments for single-gene disorders that generally affect very small patient populations. The challenges will increase as more manufacturers propose remedies for multigenic targets, such as Parkinson’s disease, which will involve new approaches for clinical trials and for production scale-up.

References

1.  C. Witten, “FDA’s Approach to the Development of Cell and Gene Therapy Products,” presentation at Cell & Gene Therapy Products Symposium 2019, June 10, 2019. 

2. FDA, Standards Development for Regenerative Medicines Therapies,FDA.gov.

3. IPRP, International Pharmaceutical Regulations Programme.

4. ICH, Significant Advancements in Global Harmonisation Efforts at ICH’s Largest Biannual Meeting to Date, Press Release, June 14, 2019. 

5. FDA, CBER Advanced Technologies Team, FDA.gov

Article Details

BioPharm International
Vol. 32, No. 8
August 2019
Pages: 8-9

Citation

When referring to this article, please cite it as J. Wechsler, "FDA Maps Strategies to Advance Cell and Gene Therapies," BioPharm International 32 (8) 2019.